Art is about what you see, what you touch, what you hear and what you feel. Art is a sentiment that could be both fascinating and repulsive at the same time. Art is a mere sensation of bliss and misery, it is a thinking that justly signifies how a flesh could perceive the essence of a flesh. Science on the other hand is impassive. It is dead, it is dull but it is sensible. It is methodological and it can be impartially explained with a bucket of intelligence, for short, it is the most significant evidence for existence.
The question is how can art be the art of senses
and how can science be a science of reasoning?
Aren't anyone's' feelings dependable enough to justify the hypothesis of life? Doesn't art include the coherent thinking of humanity? How can science be a confirmation not a theory? Are everything studied, solved and equated be a righteous assertion to the right paths of life?
Well, Science can prove everything with the perception of the mind but the art which revolves around the act of discerning clearly denotes that the science of science is an art of art as well.
